Friday, November 9, 2007

ONE-ON-ONE WITH IRAN'S OPPOSITION

(I thought this is a good recent article on the Iranian Resistance's leader Mrs. Maryam Rajavi. Since some of you have expressed interest to know more about the Iranian Resistance, I'll write more on the topic in the near future. This piece was published in the Christian Science Monitor on November 7th.)


A noted dissident says Iran is closer to a nuclear bomb than we think.
By John Hughes November 7, 2007 PROVO, UTAH - The head of the Iranian opposition group in exile that supplied early intelligence on Iran's clandestine nuclear program says President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has engineered a clever disinformation campaign to convince foreign experts that Iran is eight to 10 years away from developing a nuclear bomb. But in fact, she says, the regime is less than two years away from producing such a weapon, as part of its plan to "create an Iranian empire" in the Middle East.

In a wide-ranging weekend telephone conversation from her base of exile in Paris, Maryam Rajavi told me that Mr. Ahmadinejad has purged between 40 and 50 senior military officers who are in disagreement with his plans. She also explained that the resignation of Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, followed dispute between Mr. Larijani and Ahmadinejad over "incentives" Larijani had been prepared to offer his interlocutors in the West. Ms. Rajavi heads the Paris-based National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), whose military arm is the People's Mujahideen of Iran. The Mujahideen are listed as a terrorist organization by the US for its violent tactics. (The group allegedly supported the takeover of the US Embassy in Tehran in 1979.) But in a bizarre twist, some 3,800 Mujahideen fighters who later conducted operations against the Iranian regime from Iraqi territory during the reign of Saddam Hussein are currently being held in benign custody in Iraq by US forces as "protected" persons. The current Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is attempting to prosecute or deport them.

Rajavi says this is at the behest of Iran. Both the NCRI and the People's Mujahideen claim to have substantial underground support in Iran. Though the information of exiled groups about events in their tyrannized homelands has come under acute scrutiny since Iraqi exiles produced questionable data about events in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, the NCRI is credited by US sources with accurately identifying clandestine Iranian nuclear facilities early on. By interesting coincidence, The Times (London) recently cited Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa as the first Arab leader to directly accuse Tehran of seeking nuclear weapons.

"While they don't have the bomb yet, they are developing it, or the capability for it," The Times quotes the crown prince as saying, adding that this is the first time one of Iran's Gulf neighbors has "effectively accused [Iran] of lying about its nuclear programme." In her weekend conversation, Rajavi was adamant that "military intervention" in Iran by the US or others is not desirable. However, she praised the Bush administration for its recent branding of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist entity. The IRGC, she said, holds key positions in government, dominates much of the economy, controls the nuclear program, and has a major role in drug trafficking.

The US government's action against it, she says, is a "clear testament and an indispensable prelude to democratic change in Iran." Her own program for change in Iran is a combination of accelerated sanctions and political pressure from without and upheaval arising from discontent within.
Getting rid of her own organization's "terrorist" label, she argues, would help energize internal critics of the regime. She says support for this is growing among both Republican and Democratic members of Congress. She is heartened by recent efforts of British parliamentarians to persuade the European Union to lift restrictions on Iranian opposition groups and blacklist Iran's Revolutionary Guards. The Guards, she says, are responsible for the torture and execution of many Iranians and are the "center of all the disasters" of the Iranian people. They are also key to Iran's military role in Iraq. According to Rajavi, they use the "Ramezan" garrison and four tactical bases near the Iran-Iraq border to send arms and explosives to Iraq. NCRI has exposed three factories in a very secure area in Tehran that are making roadside bombs to send to Iraq, she adds.
In a previous conversation with Rajavi a little more than two years ago, she spoke in Persian, translated into English through an interpreter. On this occasion she spoke in heavily accented English. "I studied English in high school," she said, "but I have been practicing it more." She also speaks French. As we began our conversation, she reminded me that "everything I warned you about two years ago about Ahmadinejad has come true. He has declared war [on his perceived enemies]."

John Hughes, a former editor of the Monitor, is a professor of communications at Brigham Young University.

5 comments:

Kevin said...

Free Iran,

Thanks for highlighting this interesting article.

Rajavi sounds reasonable and knowledgeable. She does not think the US should take military action, but presumably, the Mujahideen should.

Wikipedia has an interesting article on the People's Mujahedin of Iran. It's a curious predicament that they were confronted and captured in Iraq due to their relationship with Saddam Hussein, even though their main focus was Iran.

It's hard for me to separate information from disinformation, but it looks like the tide may be shifting in their consideration as a terrorist organization.

Kevin

Free Iran said...

Kevin,

You raised two good points. One was the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran's (PMOI's) status in Iraq. I can only attest to the PMOI's independence from the previous Iraqi regime. When they were building bases in Iraq, they did not even accept the Iraqi regime's offer to be supplied with free water, etc. They built their own pipelines.

The fact is that if the PMOI was in any way, shape, or form dependent on the previous Iraqi regime, it would not have been able to survive without it. It continues to survive today because its main source of funding remains to be the Iranian people, who have sustained for over 40 years, and will continue to do so in the future.

The other point you raised was concerning the terror designation. In 1997, the US Department of State under Madeline Albright designated the PMOI as a Foreign Terrorist Organization largely at the behest of Mohammad Khatami, the then darling President of the West (who, by the way, praised himself with continuing the regime's nuclear program in secret).

We are dealing with a tyrannical regime bent on dominating the Mideast and attaining nuclear weapons.

The regime has waged a venimous disinformation campaign against the PMOI, some of which are evident in the Wikipedia article. This disinformation provided the justificatory groundwork for the terror designation.

But, rest assured, with the disinformation or without it, with the terror designation or without it, it is the Iranian people and their organized resistance who will determine the Iranian future, not the mullahs.

Kevin said...

Free Iran,

Thanks for your response. The way you depict their taking responsibility for their own freedom is certainly appealing.

I'm also curious about the government they are trying to create. It seems they began with Marxist and fundamentalist Islamic ideals but have since moved toward democracy, the free market, and equal rights regardless of gender, ethnicity, or religion. I think I read somewhere that 2/3 of their leadership is female, which seems unique relative to what I would expect of Middle East Muslim organizations (is it unique?).

Wikipedia also mentions that they support "peace in the Middle East". Sometimes that is an allusion to peace with Israel, but in this context, perhaps it is referring to their nuclear ambitions?

Kevin

Free Iran said...

Kevin,

You've certainly done some reading on them! And, it's very encouraging for me to see that.

I keep mentioning the disinformation campaign of the regime against the Iranian Resistance movement. Let's not take that lightly. Any political movement that opposes a brutal state (such as the Islamic Republic of Iran) would be branded all sorts of things. In the case of the PMOI, the regime's multi-million dollar disinformation campaign has been extraordinary.

Currently, one of the Iranian regime's publishers is collecting all the regime's publications with regards to the PMOI under one volume. There are over 250 books so far. The regime also spent millions of dollars to air a documentary against the PMOI since their popularity has been on the rise in recent years.

The PMOI was the single largest political movement immediately after the Feb. 1979 Iranian revolution. Their weekly publication had a circulation around 600,000, unprecedented in Iranian history. Nobody doubts that. Ask friend or foe, and they will tell you that the PMOI is the biggest political opponent of the regime. You'll hear that they are the "largest opposition" in news stories.

The important thing is that they are an existential threat to the Islamic fundamentalists ruling in Tehran. It would be ridiculous to call the PMOI itself Islamic fundamentalist or Marxist. It would be even more ridiculous to call them Marxist and fundamentalist together. This branding is philosophically and historically laughable. But, the regime's disinformation campaign has done it. The former Iranian monarch, the Shah, used to call the PMOI (which was a young organization at the time) Islamic-Marxists. The poor guy didn't know that this is philosophically contradictory, and he became a laughing stock among university students.

The PMOI started in the 1960s as a progressive Muslim movement. From the outset, they espoused a modern and democratic version of Islamic that differed significantly from the traditional version the mullahs proffer.

The PMOI's founders were all executed by the Shah. They claimed that the main social contradiction is not between the theists and atheists (as the mullahs will tell you), but instead between the oppressors (who may or may not believe in God) and the oppressed (who also may or may not believe in God). As a result, the main problem for them is not Islam itself, but democracy.

So, it is not accurate at all to say that the PMOI started as a Marxist/fundamentalist organization and later on they suddenly had a change of heart. Let's remember that in the world of politics such changes of heart would deal a serious blow to the integrity and unity of any organization.

To make a long story short, the PMOI has been, is, and will be a Muslim organization, simply because 95% of Iranians are Muslims. It has never been a fundamentalist group. Its who raison d'etre is to wage a struggle against fundamentalism. In a 1991 statement, the majority at the US House of Reps concluded that supporting the PMOI is the only way to block fundamentalism in the Middle East.

Because of its demoratic ideals, the PMOI members vehemently believe in gender equality. Their entire leadership council (100%) is comprised of women. The PMOI is part of a broad coaltion called the National Council of Resistance of Iran, who has a 2/3 female membership, as you rightly stated.

The National Council of Resistance of Iran was created more than 25 years ago and has publicly stated its program for the future Iran on numerous occasions. Its program is a democratic Iran, separation of church and state, and equal rights for women and minorities, supporting peace in the MidEast, etc.

I'll continuously post more stuff on this issue in the future. For now, feel free to visit the official websites of the Iranian Resistance (instead of the Iranian regime's outlets):

http://ncr-iran.org/
http://www.maryamrajavi.com/
http://www.mojahedin.org/pagesEn/index.aspx

Cheers

Kevin said...

Free Iran,

It's an interesting topic that seems to be more and more relevant by the day.

Thanks for the fascinating details and links. I'll look forward to your future posts.

Cheers,

Kevin